{"id":6559,"date":"2020-03-03T07:26:19","date_gmt":"2020-03-03T07:26:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/?p=6559"},"modified":"2020-03-03T12:02:05","modified_gmt":"2020-03-03T12:02:05","slug":"sous-la-pluie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/?p=6559","title":{"rendered":"Sous la pluie"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>
\nJ\u2019ai toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 rebelle. Petite d\u00e9j\u00e0, je n\u2019\u00e9tais pas tr\u00e8s ob\u00e9issante. Mon attirance pour la libert\u00e9 et l\u2019autonomie n\u2019a pas chang\u00e9. Quand j\u2019ai d\u00e9couvert l\u2019anarchie, j\u2019ai \u00e9t\u00e9 visc\u00e9ralement attir\u00e9e par cette plus grande expression de l\u2019ordre<\/em>. Pour moi il s\u2019agit de cette libert\u00e9 qui s\u2019arr\u00eate o\u00f9 s\u2019arr\u00eate celle des autres.<\/strong>
\nI have always been rebellious. As a child, I was not very obedient. My attraction to freedom and autonomy has not changed. When I discovered anarchy, I was viscerally drawn to this greater expression of order<\/em>. For me it\u2019s about this freedom that stops where the freedom of others stops.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00ab\u00a0Plus grande expression de l\u2019ordre\u00a0\u00bb car s\u2019il n\u2019y a pas un pouvoir au-dessus de nous pour nous contr\u00f4ler\u2026 eh bien c\u2019est \u00e0 chacun de nous de contr\u00f4ler si ce que nous faisons est favorable ou pas \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9mergence d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 harmonieuse. Je r\u00eave d\u2019un monde o\u00f9 chacun est respectueux des autres, de lui-m\u00eame, et aussi bien entendu de l\u2019environnement.<\/strong>
\n\u00ab\u00a0Greater expression of order\u00a0\u00bb because if there is not a power above us to control us … well it is up to each of us to control whether what we do is favorable or not to the emergence of a harmonious society. I dream of a world where everyone is respectful of others, of themselves, and of course of the environment.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Je ne suis pas sensible \u00e0 la hi\u00e9rarchie\u00a0: je respecte une personne parce que je la trouve digne de respect, \u00e0 cause sans doute de ses qualit\u00e9s humaines, mais certainement pas parce qu\u2019elle occupe un rang \u00e9lev\u00e9 dans la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. Je n\u2019ai pas besoin que des personnes \u00ab\u00a0sup\u00e9rieures\u00a0\u00bb \u00e0 moi g\u00e8rent une existence que je suis tout \u00e0 fait capable de g\u00e9rer.<\/strong>
\nI am not sensitive to hierarchy: I respect a person because, for me, he\u2019s worthy of respect, probably because of his human qualities, but certainly not because he occupies a high rank in society. I don’t need people \u00ab\u00a0superior\u00a0\u00bb to me to manage an existence that I am fully capable of managing.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Si je respecte la loi comme Brassens qui ne voulait pas perdre du temps en contr\u00f4les policiers, c\u2019est aussi une attitude consentie\u00a0: je ne vais pas mettre la vie des gens en danger en ne respectant pas le code de la route. Mais ce n\u2019est pas par peur du k\u00e9pi.<\/strong>
\nIf I respect the law like Brassens who did not want to waste time in police checks, it is also an agreed attitude: I am not going to put the lives of people in danger by not respecting the traffic rules. But it\u2019s not out of fear of the cap.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Quand j\u2019ai d\u00e9couvert la bande \u00e0 Bonnot, dans un livre qui relatait seulement les faits (essentiellement des braquages de banque), j\u2019ai eu du mal \u00e0 comprendre pourquoi Jules Bonnot se proclamait anarchiste. Maintenant je sais qu\u2019il y a des partisans de la violence, ce qui a permis de donner au terme \u00ab\u00a0anarchie\u00a0\u00bb le sens de \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre\u00a0\u00bb. Je ne peux pas \u00eatre d\u2019accord avec Jules Bonnot, mais je le comprends. Apr\u00e8s tout j\u2019\u00e9prouve les m\u00eames col\u00e8res que lui quand je vois les conditions de vie de certains.<\/strong>
\nWhen I discovered \u00ab <\/strong>la bande \u00e0 Bonnot\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>, in a book that only told the facts (mostly bank robberies), I had a hard time understanding why Jules Bonnot proclaimed himself anarchist. Now I know that there are supporters of violence, which has made it possible to give the term \u00ab\u00a0anarchy\u00a0\u00bb the meaning of \u00ab\u00a0disorder\u00a0\u00bb. I can’t agree with Jules Bonnot, but I understand him. After all, I experience the same anger as him when I see the living conditions of some.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Octave Garnier de \u00ab\u00a0la bande \u00e0 Bonnot\u00a0\u00bb a \u00e9crit ceci\u00a0:<\/strong>
\n\u00ab\u00a0R\u00e9fl\u00e9chissons. Nos femmes et nos enfants s\u2019entassent dans des galetas, tandis que des milliers de villas restent vides. Nous b\u00e2tissons les palais et nous vivons dans des chaumi\u00e8res. Ouvrier, d\u00e9veloppe ta vie, ton intelligence et ta force. Tu es un mouton\u00a0: les sergots sont des chiens et les bourgeois sont des bergers. Notre sang paie le luxe des riches. Notre ennemi, c\u2019est notre ma\u00eetre. Vive l\u2019anarchie.\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong><\/em>
\nOctave Garnier who was a part of \u00ab\u00a0la bande \u00e0 Bonnot\u00a0\u00bb wrote this:<\/strong><\/span>
\n\u00ab <\/strong>Let’s think. Our wives and children are crammed into attics, while thousands of villas remain empty. We build palaces and we live in thatched cottages. Worker, develop your life, your intelligence and your strength. You are a sheep: the sergots are dogs and the bourgeois are shepherds. Our blood pays for the luxury of the rich. Our enemy is our master. Long live anarchy.\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong><\/strong><\/em><\/span>
\n\u00ab\u00a0sergot\u00a0\u00bb (argot \u2014 slang<\/span>) => sergent, agent de ville \u2014 sergeant, city agent<\/span>
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Aujourd\u2019hui encore, j\u2019ai tendance \u00e0 adopter des id\u00e9es de mani\u00e8re affective, sans r\u00e9flexion pr\u00e9alable, parce qu\u2019elles m\u2019interpellent tout simplement. Dans ces conditions, je ne peux pas toujours les \u00e9tayer par de solides arguments. Mais si \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de les faire adopter par d\u2019autres je souhaite les partager, il me faut d\u00e9passer le stade affectif\u00a0!<\/strong>
\nEven today, I tend to adopt ideas in an emotional way, without prior thought, because they simply appeal to me. Under these conditions, I cannot always support them with solid arguments. But if impossible to have them adopted by others, I want to share them, I must go beyond the emotional stage!
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Les notions de solidarit\u00e9, autonomie, libert\u00e9 sont faciles \u00e0 d\u00e9fendre, ne demandant pas de justification – m\u00eame si en creusant, les d\u00e9finitions que chacun en donne peuvent diff\u00e9rer sensiblement. <\/strong>
\nThe notions of solidarity, autonomy, freedom are easy to defend, asking for no justification – even if by digging, the definitions that each one gives can differ appreciably.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

En revanche vouloir abolir le pouvoir ne fait pas l\u2019unanimit\u00e9. Quand on voit o\u00f9 nous m\u00e8ne un syst\u00e8me soi-disant \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9mocratique\u00a0\u00bb – un enrichissement ind\u00e9cent des plus riches avec mise en danger de la vie sur la plan\u00e8te, tandis que beaucoup de d\u00e9munis se battent sans espoir – on r\u00eave d\u2019un vrai changement, mais de l\u00e0 \u00e0 pr\u00e9coniser l\u2019anarchie, le pas est difficile \u00e0 faire.<\/strong>
\nHowever, wanting to abolish power is not unanimous. When we see where a so-called \u00ab\u00a0democratic\u00a0\u00bb system is leading us – an indecent enrichment of the richest with endangering life on the planet, while many destitute fight hopelessly – we dream of a real change, but from there to advocate anarchy, the approach is difficult to do.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

La semaine derni\u00e8re, j\u2019\u00e9voquais \u00ab Murray Bookchin\u00a0\u2014 l\u2019\u00e9cologie sociale et libertaire\u00a0\u00bb de Vincent Gerber et Flor\u00e9al Romero. Il y est dit que la croissance infinie est impossible dans un monde fini. Que la d\u00e9mocratie est trop inf\u00e9od\u00e9e aux groupes \u00e9conomiques\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0Il ne peut y avoir de changement \u00e9cologique sans une reprise en main de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par la base.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/strong>
\nLast week, I mentioned \u00ab Murray Bookchin\u00a0\u2014 l\u2019\u00e9cologie sociale et libertaire\u00a0\u00bb by Vincent Gerber and Flor\u00e9al Romero. It says that infinite growth is impossible in a finite world. That democracy is too subservient to economic groups: \u00ab\u00a0There can be no ecological change without taking control of society from the bottom up.\u00a0\u00bb
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Si l\u2019\u00eatre humain cause des d\u00e9s\u00e9quilibres \u00e0 la nature, il en est de m\u00eame dans la structure m\u00eame de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9cisent les auteurs. \u00ab\u00a0Les d\u00e9s\u00e9quilibres qu\u2019il a provoqu\u00e9s dans le monde naturel r\u00e9sultent de ceux qu\u2019il a provoqu\u00e9s dans la soci\u00e9t\u00e9.\u00a0\u00bb <\/em><\/strong>
\nIf humans cause imbalances in nature, it is the same in the very structure of society, the authors say. \u00ab\u00a0The imbalances that he has caused in the natural world are the result of those that he has caused in society.\u00a0\u00bb
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Partout on parle de d\u00e9shumanisation, j\u2019aime beaucoup comment Gerber et Romero abordent ce probl\u00e8me et notre permanent besoin de lien social sans oublier de donner du sens \u00e0 nos vies\u00a0:<\/strong>
\nEverywhere we talk about dehumanization, I really like how Gerber and Romero approach this problem and our permanent need for social link without forgetting to give meaning to our lives:
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00ab\u00a0L\u2019\u00eatre humain est ainsi toujours plus d\u00e9personnalis\u00e9, car toujours mis en concurrence, atomis\u00e9, coup\u00e9 des liens avec son prochain, donc de lui-m\u00eame et de son individualit\u00e9, et toujours plus construit et model\u00e9 selon la volont\u00e9 du march\u00e9. Pour Bookchin, il est urgent de r\u00e9humaniser la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 et par cons\u00e9quent chacun de nous, de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 reprendre \u00e0 notre compte \u201cl\u2019\u00eatre-au-monde-ensemble\u201d qui se manifeste dans tout ce qui rel\u00e8ve du don, d\u2019une existence riche et significative, en empathie avec l\u2019autre autant qu\u2019avec l\u2019environnement. Il s\u2019agit de reprendre conscience du besoin de donner sens et valeur \u00e0 nos vies.\u00a0\u00bb (\u2026).<\/strong><\/em>
\n\u00ab\u00a0The human being is therefore always more depersonalized, because he is always in competition, atomized, cut from links with his neighbor, therefore of himself and his individuality, and always more constructed and shaped according to the will of the market. For Bookchin, it is urgent to rehumanize society and therefore each of us, so as to take over our \u201cbeing-in-the-world-together\u201d which manifests itself in everything that comes from the gift, of a rich and meaningful existence, in empathy with the other as much as with the environment. It’s about regaining awareness of the need to give meaning and value to our lives.\u00a0\u00bb (\u2026).
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Quelques lignes de blog ne suffisent pas \u00e0 d\u00e9velopper un tel sujet, je suis consciente d\u2019une approche bien trop succincte, mais que voulez-vous\u2026 ces th\u00e8mes me passionnent et il en va de notre futur. <\/strong>
\nA few blog lines are not enough to develop such a subject, I am aware of an approach that is far too succinct, but what do you want … these topics fascinate me and so does our future.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ces id\u00e9es qui me sont ch\u00e8res ne sont pas celles de tout le monde\u00a0: quand j\u2019\u00e9tais directrice d\u2019\u00e9cole, je souhaitais partager ce r\u00f4le avec les coll\u00e8gues plut\u00f4t que de l\u2019endosser. J\u2019\u00e9tais la seule \u00e0 le souhaiter\u00a0! Ce n\u2019est pas un tr\u00e8s bon exemple car ce poste n\u2019est pas si important, mais l\u2019attitude des coll\u00e8gues m\u2019a frapp\u00e9e. Il m\u2019arrivait d\u2019\u00eatre la bonne interlocutrice<\/em> vis-\u00e0-vis de ma hi\u00e9rarchie ou de l\u2019administration puisque j\u2019\u00e9tais directrice \u2014 je n\u2019ai jamais pu m\u2019y faire\u2026!<\/strong>
\nThese ideas I love are not those of everyone: when I was a school principal, I wanted to share this role with colleagues rather than take it on. I was the only one who wanted it! It is not a very good example because this position is not so important, but the attitude of colleagues surprised me a lot. Sometimes I was the right contact<\/em> with my hierarchy or the administration since I was headmistress – I could never get used to it!
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Une autre personne ne partage pas du tout mes id\u00e9es.<\/strong>
\nMon p\u00e8re aura 93 ans cette semaine. Il est raciste, x\u00e9nophobe, et r\u00e9actionnaire. Je trouve qu\u2019il a du m\u00e9rite et du courage \u00e0 vivre comme il le fait, seul, presque aveugle. Mais en ce qui concerne ses opinions, je pr\u00e9f\u00e9rerais qu\u2019il les garde pour lui. Il m\u2019arrive de lui parler sinc\u00e8rement de mes id\u00e9es\u2026 une excellente fa\u00e7on de comprendre qu\u2019une conviction, \u00e7a ne se partage pas comme \u00e7a.<\/strong>
\nAnother person does not share my ideas at all.<\/strong><\/span>
\nMy father will be 93 this week. He is racist, xenophobic, and reactionary. For me he has merit and courage to live as he does, alone, almost blind. But regarding his opinions, I would prefer that he keep them for himself. Sometimes I tell him sincerely about my ideas … a great way to understand that a belief cannot be shared like that.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Je vais parfois le voir, j\u2019y suis all\u00e9e quelques jours avant No\u00ebl et nous avons pu faire des balades pr\u00e8s de chez lui\u00a0: je connais cette chapelle depuis tr\u00e8s longtemps, j\u2019ai plaisir \u00e0 la retrouver. Un autre jour, nous avons rencontr\u00e9 un homme qui connaissait papa. Et moi, j\u2019avais connu le grand-p\u00e8re de cet homme\u00a0! J\u2019aimais beaucoup Albert, si gentil, et je raconte \u00e0 cet homme ma derni\u00e8re rencontre avec son grand-p\u00e8re.<\/strong>
\n\"\"<\/a>
\nSometimes I go to visit him, I went there a few days before Christmas and we were able to go for walks near his home: I have known this chapel for a very long time, I am pleased to see it again. Another day we met a man who knew Dad. And I had known this man\u2019s grandfather! I really liked Albert, so nice, and I tell this man about my last meeting with his grandfather.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ces rencontres fortuites me rattachent \u00e0 tout un pan de mon existence. Albert n\u2019est plus l\u00e0, mais c\u2019est bon de se souvenir. C\u2019est bon de revenir marcher dans ces sentiers et de retrouver les sensations que je reconnais aussi loin que je me rappelle. Quand Paul me rejoint chez mon p\u00e8re, nous faisons une grande balade dans le beau village m\u00e9di\u00e9val de Saint-Montan, j\u2019avais publi\u00e9 des photos que vous pouvez retrouver en cliquant ici.<\/a><\/strong>
\nThese chance encounters link me to a whole section of my existence. Albert is no longer there, but it is good to remember. It is good to come back to walk these paths and find the sensations that I recognize as far back as I can remember. When Paul joins me at my father\u2019s, we are taking a long walk in the beautiful medieval village of Saint-Montan, I had published photos which you can find<\/span> by clicking here.
\n<\/a>\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

En f\u00e9vrier, je suis retourn\u00e9e chez mon p\u00e8re\u00a0: \u00e0 cette occasion, j\u2019ai pass\u00e9 une journ\u00e9e sous la bruine et dans le brouillard, dont j\u2019avais vraiment perdu l\u2019habitude dans le sud de l\u2019Ard\u00e8che\u00a0! Ma s\u0153ur habite en pleine guarrigue, t\u00e9moin de la vie sauvage, et elle me raconte ce qui \u00e9volue sous ses yeux. Bizarrement, alors que le d\u00e9partement du Gard et les autres plus au sud subissent de fr\u00e9quentes inondations, le sud de l\u2019Ard\u00e8che manque de pluie depuis des ann\u00e9es. <\/strong>
\nOn February, I returned to my father’s house: on this occasion, I spent a day in the drizzle and in the fog, which I had really lost the habit in the south of the Ard\u00e8che! My sister lives in full guarrigue (scrubland ?), she\u2019s witness of the wild life, and she tells me what evolves before her eyes. Oddly, while the Gard department and the others further south suffer frequent flooding, the south of the Ard\u00e8che has been lacking in rain for years.
\n\"\"<\/a><\/strong>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

J\u2019ai ramen\u00e9 mon p\u00e8re chez nous, et apr\u00e8s quelques jours je l\u2019ai raccompagn\u00e9 chez lui\u00a0: je crois qu\u2019il aime bien prendre quelques vacances chez nous, o\u00f9 il n\u2019a plus le souci des repas. Ni d\u2019autres soucis.<\/strong>
\nI brought my father to our home, and after a few days I took him to his home: I think he likes to take a vacation with us, where he no longer cares about meals. No other worries.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Nous restons chacun sur des points de vue bien trop divergents. Et pourtant, nous avons bien quelques points en commun.<\/strong>
\nToujours dans le livre autour de Bookchin, il est dit que la production pour la production g\u00e9n\u00e8re la consommation pour la consommation, et mon p\u00e8re est tout aussi hostile au gaspillage que moi. Il est tout aussi favorable \u00e0 la fabrication d\u2019objets durables, r\u00e9parables\u2026 Bookchin distingue les besoins r\u00e9els (se nourrir, se loger\u2026) des besoins artificiels (se procurer tout ce qui est \u00e0 la mode\u2026).<\/strong>
\nWe each remain on far too divergent points of view. And yet, we do have a few things in common.<\/strong><\/span>
\nAlso in the book around Bookchin, it says that production for production generates consumption for consumption, and my father is just as hostile to waste as I am. He is also favorable to the manufacture of durable, repairable objects … Bookchin distinguishes between real needs (food, shelter …) and artificial needs (getting everything in fashion …).
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Je crois que mon p\u00e8re est encore d\u2019accord quand je dis qu\u2019il faut un changement politique radical, que nos dirigeants ne veulent pas r\u00e9ellement modifier les choses. Mais lui ne voit comme moyens de changement que la r\u00e9pression, la punition, l\u2019interdiction. <\/strong>
\nI think my father still agrees when I say that we need a radical political change, that our leaders do not really want to change things. But he sees only as means of change repression, punishment, prohibition.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Un grand foss\u00e9 nous s\u00e9pare et je le regrette, mais j\u2019en ai pris mon parti depuis longtemps. <\/strong>
\nThere is a big gap between us and I regret it, but I have made up my mind for a long time.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Il pleut il pleut et il pleut. Je tiendrais certainement le m\u00eame discours s\u2019il faisait soleil\u2026<\/strong>
\nFran\u00e7ois, tu nous fait rencontrer ton ami Vincent Gerber quand tu veux\u00a0!<\/strong>
\nIt’s raining it’s raining and it’s raining. I would certainly make the same speech if it was sunny …<\/strong><\/span>
\nFran\u00e7ois, you make us meet your friend Vincent Gerber when you want!<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

J\u2019ai toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 rebelle. Petite d\u00e9j\u00e0, je n\u2019\u00e9tais pas tr\u00e8s ob\u00e9issante. Mon attirance pour la libert\u00e9 et l\u2019autonomie n\u2019a pas chang\u00e9. Quand j\u2019ai d\u00e9couvert l\u2019anarchie, j\u2019ai \u00e9t\u00e9 visc\u00e9ralement attir\u00e9e par cette plus grande expression de l\u2019ordre. Pour moi il s\u2019agit … Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6559","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6559"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6559"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6559\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6598,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6559\/revisions\/6598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}