{"id":11469,"date":"2022-04-11T19:08:22","date_gmt":"2022-04-11T19:08:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/?p=11469"},"modified":"2022-04-11T19:08:22","modified_gmt":"2022-04-11T19:08:22","slug":"lire-apres-lure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/?p=11469","title":{"rendered":"Lire apr\u00e8s Lure"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

Il m\u2019arrive d\u2019acheter un livre parce qu\u2019il m\u2019\u00e9blouit, parce qu\u2019il semble me donner des cl\u00e9s importantes, parce qu\u2019il stimule ma r\u00e9flexion par une analyse originale. Ce qui me capte dans une librairie, ce sont les ouvrages qui m\u2019expliquent le monde\u00a0: alors, feuilletant ci feuilletant \u00e7a, j\u2019ai le porte-monnaie qui me d\u00e9mange entre sociologie, politique ou jardinage, autobiographies ou biographies, petits essais abscons ou th\u00e8ses consistantes et si je laisse faire, je rapporte un lourd butin.<\/strong>
Sometimes I buy a book because it dazzles me, because it seems to give me important keys, because it stimulates my thinking through an original analysis. What captivates me in a bookstore are the books that explain the world to me: so, leafing through this leafing through that, my wallet is itching between sociology, politics or gardening, autobiographies or biographies, little abstruse essays or consistent theses and if I let it go, I bring back a heavy booty.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

Malheureusement, il me manque souvent une formation intellectuelle pour capter le message, apr\u00e8s tout quand j\u2019ai commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00e9tudier la philo au lyc\u00e9e, je n\u2019y ai rien compris. Comme ces id\u00e9ogrammes \u00e9crits avec de l\u2019eau, l\u2019id\u00e9e exprim\u00e9e s\u2019\u00e9vapore trop vite pour faire sens avec la suite. Voil\u00e0 un livre auquel je n\u2019ai pas acc\u00e8s. C\u2019est d\u00e9courageant, comme quand Gandalf ne r\u00e9ussit pas \u00e0 ouvrir la porte de la Moria, faute de conna\u00eetre la formule magique.<\/strong>
Unfortunately, I often lack an intellectual formation to capture the message, after all when I started studying philosophy in high school, I didn’t understand anything. Like these ideograms written with water, the idea expressed evaporates too quickly to make sense with what follows. This is a book I don’t have access to. It’s disheartening, like when Gandalf couldn’t open the door to Moria, because he didn’t know the magic formula.<\/strong><\/span>
Comment suivre un raisonnement quand la parole est touffue, quand le texte est si dense que je m\u2019y perds\u00a0? Comment dig\u00e9rer ce que je lis, en faire ma propre substance\u00a0?<\/strong>
How do I follow a reasoning when the speech is thick, when the text is so dense that I get lost in it? How do I digest what I read, make it my own stuff?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

J\u2019ai \u00e9labor\u00e9 ma propre formule magique\u00a0: \u00e9trange peut-\u00eatre, mais elle fonctionne. Je prends le livre \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re page, je choisis une sorte de mot-cl\u00e9, et, sacril\u00e8ge, je l\u2019entoure au crayon\u00a0! Il peut s\u2019agir d\u2019un mot tr\u00e8s simple, m\u00eame d\u2019une pr\u00e9position, parfois une n\u00e9gation me suffit. Je m\u2019installe dans la page, j\u2019entoure quelques mots, je les relis (et ils se relient), et cette fois la page a du sens. Je peux m\u00eame la r\u00e9\u00e9crire \u00e0 ma fa\u00e7on\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0Si nous en \u00e9tions rest\u00e9s au regret du \u201cc\u2019\u00e9tait mieux avant\u201d, l\u2019humanit\u00e9 en serait encore \u00e0 la pr\u00e9histoire. Les humains ont peur du changement, mais ceux-ci se produisent, et m\u00eame de plus en plus vite. Des penseurs sans formation scientifique pr\u00e9disent le pire sans tenir compte de tout ce qui s\u2019est d\u00e9j\u00e0 produit par le pass\u00e9, y compris les catastrophes. Ce livre propose une approche scientifique pour remettre les choses \u00e0 leur place, et que l\u2019on en arrive \u00e0 une gestion raisonnable des ph\u00e9nom\u00e8nes soci\u00e9taux.<\/span>\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> (Je souligne quand je cite exactement l\u2019auteur.)<\/strong>
I have devised my own magic formula: strange perhaps, but it works. I take the book to the first page, I choose some kind of keyword, and, sacrilege, I circle it with a pencil! It can be a very simple word, even a preposition, sometimes a negation is enough for me. I settle into the page, circle a few words, reread them (and they connect), – in French it\u2019s a joke: je les relis (et ils se relient) – and this time the page makes sense. I can even rewrite it in my own way: \u00ab If we had remained with the regret of \u201cit was better before\u201d, humanity would still be in prehistory. Humans are afraid of change, but change is happening, and even faster. Thinkers without scientific training predict the worst without taking into account everything that has happened in the past, including disasters. This book offers a scientific approach to put things in their place, and to arrive at a reasonable management of societal phenomena.<\/span> \u00bb<\/em> (I underline when quoting the author.)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Ils travaillent pendant que je lis\u00a0!
They work while I read!<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

Je commence \u00e0 m\u2019y retrouver. Je r\u00e9ussis ainsi \u00e0 saisir l\u2019introduction de \u00ab\u00a0Arr\u00eatons d\u2019avoir peur – la science vous aide \u00e0 y voir plus clair\u00a0\u00bb \u00e9crit par le professeur Didier Raoult. Le personnage, tr\u00e8s m\u00e9diatis\u00e9, a peut-\u00eatre un ego surdimensionn\u00e9, sa r\u00e9putation est tr\u00e8s particuli\u00e8re, mais je trouve int\u00e9ressante sa pens\u00e9e, et si j\u2019arrive \u00e0 la saisir, je pourrai mettre en marche dans ma t\u00eate la machine-\u00e0-r\u00e9fl\u00e9chir qui ne demande que \u00e7a.<\/strong>
I’m starting to find myself there. I thus managed to grasp the introduction to \u00ab\u00a0Arr\u00eatons d\u2019avoir peur – la science vous aide \u00e0 y voir plus clair\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab Let’s stop being afraid – science helps you see more clearly \u00bb written by Professor Didier Raoult. The character, very publicized, may have an oversized ego, his reputation is very particular, but I find his thought interesting, and if I manage to grasp it, I will be able to start the thinking-machine in my head who only asks for that.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

Parenth\u00e8se sur une id\u00e9e qui g\u00e9n\u00e8re mes plus grandes inqui\u00e9tudes. Quand Didier Raoult \u00e9crit \u00ab\u00a0Nous n\u2019avons pas les moyens de g\u00e9rer l\u2019avenir\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> je lui donne raison, mais alors\u2026 qu\u2019en est-il de l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire, comment convaincre nos descendants de g\u00e9rer correctement les saloperies que nous leur laissons en h\u00e9ritage, les centrales et leurs tonnes de d\u00e9chets toxiques\u00a0? Comment les former \u00e0 cela\u00a0? <\/strong>
\u00ab\u00a0Nous sommes \u00e0 l\u2019aube de d\u00e9couvertes exceptionnelles\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> poursuit ce scientifique. C\u2019est pour cela qu\u2019il croit que la science r\u00e9soudra tous les probl\u00e8mes\u00a0: parce que c\u2019est un chercheur avec un solide bagage et la connaissance pr\u00e9cise des d\u00e9couvertes en question. Il \u00ab\u00a0suffit\u00a0\u00bb (\u00e7a, c\u2019est moi qui le dis) que la science ait les moyens mat\u00e9riels d\u2019avancer. Il \u00ab\u00a0suffit\u00a0\u00bb de ne pas porter au pouvoir des personnes \u00e0 l\u2019intelligence format\u00e9e par les banques, incapables de voir o\u00f9 sont les vrais probl\u00e8mes. Cependant l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire pourrait bien g\u00e9n\u00e9rer des probl\u00e8mes insolubles, et \u00e7a, c\u2019est encore moi qui le dis, mais je ne suis pas la seule \u00e0 le penser\u00a0!<\/strong>
Parenthesis on an idea that generates my greatest concerns. When Didier Raoult writes \u00ab\u00a0We don’t have the means to manage the future\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> I agree with him, but then… what about the nuclear industry, how do we convince our descendants to properly manage the crap we leave them as a legacy, the power plants and their tons of toxic waste? How do you train them for this?<\/span><\/strong>
\u00ab\u00a0We are at the dawn of exceptional discoveries\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> continues this scientist. This is why he believes that science will solve all problems: because he is a researcher with a solid background and precise knowledge of the discoveries in question. It is \u00ab\u00a0enough\u00a0\u00bb (that’s me saying) that science has the material means to advance. It is \u00ab\u00a0enough\u00a0\u00bb not to bring to power people with bank-trained intelligence who cannot see where the real problems are. However the nuclear industry could well generate insoluble problems, and that, it is again me who says it, but I am not the only one to think it!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

De toute fa\u00e7on, ce livre permet un autre regard sur le monde. Il s\u2019attaque aux id\u00e9es re\u00e7ues et fournit une foule d\u2019exemples. J\u2019appr\u00e9cie toujours les id\u00e9es \u00e9loign\u00e9es de la \u00ab\u00a0pens\u00e9e unique\u00a0\u00bb.<\/strong>
Anyway, this book allows another view of the world. He tackles common belief and provides a host of examples. I always appreciate ideas away from \u00ab\u00a0one-size-fits-all thinking\u00a0\u00bb.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

Un autre ouvrage attend que je le lise pendant l\u2019hiver – avez-vous remarqu\u00e9 que le printemps est l\u00e0\u00a0?J\u2019arr\u00eaterai d\u2019avoir peur plus tard car il s\u2019agit du livre \u00ab\u00a0les soins naturels aux arbres\u00a0\u00bb d\u2019\u00c9ric Petiot aux \u00e9ditions du Terran. Si je veux passer mon dipl\u00f4me de sorci\u00e8re, je ne peux plus remettre \u00e0 demain ce que personne ne voudra faire \u00e0 ma place apr\u00e8s-demain\u00a0: j\u2019aimerais apprendre \u00e0 fabriquer les substances qui feront du bien aux plantes du parc et du jardin. Autant suivre une formation s\u00e9rieuse, et la publication d\u2019\u00c9ric Petiot peut me le permettre. Si je l\u2019\u00e9tudie au lieu de passer mes journ\u00e9es sur mon blog, bien entendu\u2026<\/strong>
Another book is waiting for me to read it during the winter – have you noticed that spring is here? I’ll stop being afraid later because it’s the book \u00ab\u00a0natural tree care\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0les soins naturels aux arbres\u00a0\u00bb by Eric Petiot published by Terran. If I want to graduate as a witch, I can’t put off until tomorrow what no one will want to do for me the day after tomorrow: I’d like to learn how to make substances that will benefit the plants in the park and garden. I might as well follow a serious training, and the publication of \u00c9ric Petiot can allow me to do so. If I study it instead of spending my days on my blog, of course\u2026<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

D\u00e8s les premi\u00e8res pages, l\u2019historique des modes de traitement est passionnant\u00a0: savez-vous que le premier cas de r\u00e9sistance d\u2019insectes aux insecticides a \u00e9t\u00e9 signal\u00e9 d\u00e9j\u00e0 en 1914\u00a0? Par ailleurs, des firmes comme Rh\u00f4ne-Poulenc n\u2019ont pas pratiqu\u00e9 une autre forme de r\u00e9sistance face au Reich, \u00ab\u00a0y compris au d\u00e9triment des juifs \u00e9vinc\u00e9s\u00a0\u00bb pr\u00e9cise l\u2019auteur. Je savais d\u00e9j\u00e0 que Rh\u00f4ne-Poulenc, Bayer et tant d\u2019autres s\u2019\u00e9taient enrichis par la guerre de fa\u00e7on inconcevable. L\u2019historienne Annie Lacroix-Riz n\u2019a trouv\u00e9 nulle part de trace de contrainte. La question de la r\u00e9sistance conclut-elle, \u00ab\u00a0ne s\u2019est jamais vraiment pos\u00e9e aux dirigeants de la finance et de l\u2019industrie (\u2026), elle \u00e9tait aberrante, \u00e9trang\u00e8re \u00e0 leurs pr\u00e9occupations (\u2026), la r\u00e9sistance est rest\u00e9e longtemps pour eux absurde et sans objet\u00a0\u00bb.<\/strong>
From the first pages, the history of treatment methods is fascinating: did you know that the first case of insect resistance to insecticides was reported already in 1914? Moreover, firms like Rh\u00f4ne-Poulenc did not practice any other form of resistance against the Reich, \u00ab\u00a0including to the detriment of the ousted Jews\u00a0\u00bb, specifies the author. I already knew that Rh\u00f4ne-Poulenc, Bayer and so many others had enriched themselves by the war in an inconceivable way. Historian Annie Lacroix-Riz found no trace of coercion anywhere. The question of resistance, she concludes, \u00ab\u00a0never really arose for the leaders of finance and industry (…), it was aberrant, foreign to their concerns (…), the resistance remained for a long time for them absurd and pointless\u00a0\u00bb.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Tu poses si tu as quelque chose \u00e0 poser, tu prends ce qui t’int\u00e9resse.
You put if you have something to put, you take what interests you.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

Bon, j\u2019appr\u00e9cie de trouver ces informations dans un livre technique. Il a de plus une pr\u00e9sentation belle et efficace avec de nombreux encadr\u00e9s et des bandeaux, par exemple productrice de rot\u00e9none qui facilitent la lecture (tiens, c\u2019est un peu pareil quand j\u2019encadre un mot\u2026!). Les illustrations sont utiles. Et j\u2019ai mis longtemps \u00e0 remarquer la petite chenille qui court sur le cadre\u00a0! <\/strong>
Well, I appreciate finding this information in a technical book. It also has a beautiful and effective presentation with many frames and banners, for example productrice de rot\u00e9none (rotenone producer) which facilitates reading (hey, it’s a bit the same when I frame a word…!). Illustrations are helpful. And it took me a long time to notice the little caterpillar running across the frame!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

Mais je prends conscience seulement maintenant que quand nous parlons d\u2019agriculture conventionnelle, il ne s\u2019agit pas, mais alors pas du tout, des pratiques ancestrales. L\u2019usage des produits chimiques est r\u00e9cent, l\u2019agriculture conventionnelle a connu un essor fulgurant au d\u00e9but du vingti\u00e8me si\u00e8cle. Les pratiques modernes n\u2019ont rien de traditionnel. L\u2019agriculture biologique cherche \u00e0 retrouver le savoir qui s\u2019est perdu, et \u00e0 le d\u00e9velopper \u00e0 l\u2019aide d\u2019analyses ou d\u2019observations.<\/strong>
But I am only now realizing that when we talk about conventional agriculture, we are not talking about ancestral practices, not at all. The use of chemicals is recent, conventional agriculture experienced a dazzling rise at the beginning of the twentieth century. Modern practices are not traditional. Organic farming seeks to recover the knowledge that has been lost, and to develop it using analyzes or observations.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

J\u2019allais vous faire un cours complet sur l\u2019agriculture mais je vois d\u00e9j\u00e0 Paul me faire les gros yeux, lui qui a not\u00e9 la bri\u00e8vet\u00e9 de ma page de la semaine derni\u00e8re\u2026 Trop long, trop court\u2026 c\u2019est toujours trop\u2026 Je ferai mieux de reprendre ma lecture interrompue.<\/strong>
Il n\u2019y a pas vraiment de lien entre mon texte et mes photos. Vous avez pu voir celles de la derni\u00e8re journ\u00e9e avec le broyeur, avec l\u2019aide des habitu\u00e9s et des nouveaux\u2026 Un gros travail fatigant, encore une fois, mais nous \u00e9tions 8 et \u00e0 midi nous avions termin\u00e9\u00a0! Merci encore une fois \u00e0 Lolo, Jean-Pierre et Chantal, merci \u00e0 J\u00e9r\u00f4me, Yves et Karine. On a pass\u00e9 une belle journ\u00e9e avec vous tous\u00a0!<\/strong>
I was going to give you a complete course on agriculture but I can already see Paul making big eyes at me, he who noted the brevity of my page last week\u2026 Too long, too short\u2026 it’s always too much\u2026 I better resume my interrupted reading.<\/span><\/strong>
There is not really a link between my text and my photos. You could see the ones from the last day with the grinder, with the help of regulars and new ones\u2026 A lot of tiring work, again, but there were 8 of us and by noon we were done! Thanks once again to Lolo, Jean-Pierre and Chantal, thanks to J\u00e9r\u00f4me, Yves and Karine. We had a great day with you all!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

Vous avez pu voir aussi la rencontre \u00e0 Lhuis de jardiniers, dans une ambiance vraiment sympathique. Tu poses ce que tu as apport\u00e9, tu prends ce qui t\u2019int\u00e9resse. Il n\u2019est m\u00eame pas n\u00e9cessaire de faire la moindre tractation, c\u2019est \u00e0 disposition. Nous avons \u00e9cout\u00e9 la chorale avec Soizic et Gauthier\u2026<\/strong>
You could also see the meeting at Lhuis of gardeners, in a really friendly atmosphere. You put down what you brought, you take what interests you. It is not even necessary to make the slightest negotiation, it is available. We listened to the choir with Soizic est Gauthier\u2026<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Sous la couverture, le b\u00e9b\u00e9\u00a0!
Under the blanket, the baby!<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

\u2026et Esther dans une formation musicale.<\/strong>
\u2026and Esther in a musical formation.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n

Je ne serai pas l\u00e0 la semaine prochaine, je crois que je vous retrouve le 26 avril.<\/strong>
I won’t be there next week, I think I’ll meet you on April 26th.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il m\u2019arrive d\u2019acheter un livre parce qu\u2019il m\u2019\u00e9blouit, parce qu\u2019il semble me donner des cl\u00e9s importantes, parce qu\u2019il stimule ma r\u00e9flexion par une analyse originale. Ce qui me capte dans une librairie, ce sont les ouvrages qui m\u2019expliquent le monde\u00a0: … Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11469"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11469"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11469\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11492,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11469\/revisions\/11492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasassezdetemps.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}